Business Economy General News News

Global Bribery Risk Index: India Ranks 77

Global Bribery Risk Index

In Global Bribery Risk Index, India ranks 77th with a worldwide score of 45 calculating company bribery risks by 2020. The list of indicators of business risk in 194 states, territories, and autonomous and semi-autonomous regions by TRACE, an anti-bribery standard establishment organisation. The most serious commercial risk of bribery, according to this year’s results, is North Korea, Turkmenistan, South Sudan, Venezuela and Eritrea while Denmark, Norway, Sweden and New Zealand are the lowest.

Also read – Bharti Singh: NCB raids her residence, takes Bharti Singh and her husband for questioning

In 2019, India kept 78 places with a ranking of 48, with the nation reaching 77 by 2020 with 45. The score is based on four factors. First is the relationship of business with the government. Second is the dissuasion and regulation of corruption. The third is the accountability of government. The fourth is public services and the potential for civil society monitoring, including media positions.

Global Bribery Risk Index

China, Pakistan, Nepal and Bangladesh, India has gone better than neighbours. The data showed that Bhutan, meanwhile, was 48th with 37. TRACE Bribery Risk Matrix reported in a statement. “China has potentially helped reduce public officials’ bribe demand opportunities by further streamlining their bureaucracies.”

Global Bribery Risk Index

In addition, the matrix has a ranking of 45, in addition to India, Peru, Jordan, Northern Macedonia, Columbia and Montenegro. Somalia has been ranked 187th out of 194 in the lower ranking held from 2017 to 2019. The TRACE Bribery Risk Matrix stated that in 194 jurisdictions it tests the probability of bribe demands. The paper was first released in 2014 to address a need for accurate. It nuanced knowledge in the business community about the risks of global commercial bribery.

The matrix gathers specific information gathered by major public interests and international bodies. In addition, the United Nations, the World Bank, University of Göteborg’s V-Dem Institute and the World Economic Forum. This knowledge allows businesses to determine the possible risk of demand for bribes in-country. Also to develop enforcement systems adapted to this risk.

About the author

Diksha Kumari

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment